The notions of “average” or
“above/below average” also really throw me off when I am grading. I completely understand the importance of
having grade level benchmarks and expectations so that teachers and students
can be accountable for the growth that needs to happen over the course of a
year. However, I have a problem with labeling
(through grading) a student as above, below, or just average based on something
generic that we apply to all our students.
As mentioned above, it is so problematic for me to think about my
struggling writers and readers getting a D as their grade but in reality making
huge changes for the better. I know also
that a letter grade doesn’t say it all, and that communicating this to parents
is also important, but the labeling of the grade is still what makes me
uncomfortable. So as report card pick-up
time came around I found myself really focusing and realizing more the
importance of parent involvement and participation. When parents come to meet with us just for
that short 10 minute session really gives my MT and I the opportunity to have
these conversations with parents that can be so crucial. They need to understand that a letter grade
isn’t the end all be all of school and that each child has struggles and
successes and that is where the real importance of education lies.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Cosmas Week 11
As our first
quarter comes to a close and report cards go out I have been thinking a lot
more about grading and what a “fair” grade or rubric really means. My students receive actual letter grades A-F for
math, reading, writing, social studies, and science. When I was in elementary school I don’t
remember getting letter grades until at least 4th or 5th
grade so giving such young students letter grades is a bit strange for me. I mostly struggle when looking at a below
average student and giving them a corresponding letter grade for their
performance. My MT has told me that she
tries to just be realistic with grades so that when students run into
difficulties or need extra help it’s not foreign to the student or their
parents that their child may be struggling.
Though I completely agree with this idea, it is still difficult for me
to give a student a C in writing because they are doing “average” 1st
or 2nd grade work. I see such
great strengths and positive moments in each of my students every day that I always
feel they are having personal successes that are worth more than just a letter
grade. Even though a student may be
writing at a C or “average” level, they may be making huge strides for their
own personal progress.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Again, these are very important trade-offs and important issues in education to wrestle with, although no easy or clear cut solution to them exists. This makes me think about the importance of specifying one's goals and objectives for instruction (e.g., thinking about the big ideas, objectives for students) as well as what type of evidence will count as evidence for what students think and are able to do. Not only do such objectives and goals help you to make decisions in your own instruction and grading, but these objectives and criteria are much more meaningful than simply saying, "Average" or "Above average". Instead, the teacher, students, and parents all become aware of where the student is at and what might be done to advance the students' thinking and understanding.
ReplyDelete