Lately in my classroom I have
been noticing the repetition in scheduling and activities that occurs. We follow the same schedule of subjects
everyday which I can’t deny is beneficial for both my sanity and for the
students to have a comfortable and familiar daily experience. I do believe that having the same schedule
day to day greatly impacts the ease of teaching and transitions. However, I do think that too much repetition
in the activities that occur during the day is not always the best thing. For example, every morning during our morning
meeting and calendar we cover the same topics.
There are an overwhelming amount of educational moments during this time,
but it has become so routine that I find myself even getting bored at times. I struggle though to decide whether the repetition
in a task such as this is beneficial to help concrete some concepts, or if it
is just boring my students into a predictable stupor. I often add small new activities to spark
student interest and that seems to help ease away the mounting
predictability. However, I also think
that some topics are very necessary for students to master so why not review
them daily.
This
struggle gets complicated (as usual) by the fact that I have both 1st
and 2nd grade. I do
differentiate my instruction during this time by asking some more challenging
questions of my 2nd graders. I
do also have differing expectations for student responses depending on their
levels, but it doesn’t seem like this is enough to me. I have some students who really benefit from
hearing, for example, place value examples every morning. While I have some others who look at me as if
this was the easiest task in the world.
I know that this is the case in any classroom within any school, but I still
do notice it day to day. So, once again I
am left to question: Is repetition beneficial or boring?
Besides
morning calendar, I often feel this repetition in activities during writer’s
workshop time. Typically we use the
Lucky Calkin’s texts on writer’s workshop daily. This includes a mini-lesson together, guided
practice, and individual practice. Though
I do NOT doubt the positive outcome of this type of scaffolding “I do, we do,
you do” type of learning, I just think it becomes a little dry for
students. I don’t doubt that they say to
themselves, “Now I have to listen on the carpet and then go write something”
when it’s time for writer’s workshop.
Here’s the catch though, my students perform the best during this time
of day. They are focused during our
mini-lesson, active participant in the learning process, and produce great
pieces of writing. Therefore I am left
to wonder, is it just me that is bored with the repetition in this type of
lesson? Or are my students bored as well?
Then I also think of the saying, “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it” and I
am tempted to just keep going as usual. I
think this intuition about when to add something more exciting, and when to
keep things as is will grow within me with time.
No comments:
Post a Comment